06Jun

Vaccine trials underrepresent large segments of the population, while women are overrepresented, says a study published recently on the JAMA Network Open.

“In this cross-sectional study of 230 US-based clinical trials with 219,555 participants, Black or African American, American Indian or Alaska Native, Hispanic or Latino, and older adults were underrepresented and women were overrepresented compared with the US population,” the research study authors wrote.

Equally significant was the lack of ethnic and racial data reported by trial managers.

“One of the most important findings,” the report says, “Was that despite FDA recommendations, many studies were not complying with reporting guidance regarding demographic characteristics of the study population.”

The researchers found only 34% of the trials reported ethnicity; 58% reported race. All included age and sex data.

“This is a massive gap in information, and if we want to improve enrollment in clinical trials and we want to see diversity in clinical trials, we need the data,” Steven Pergam, an author on the paper told StatNews. “It’s amazing that we don’t have the data.”

Of the trials that did report race, that reported race, Black adults accounted for 11% of the trial participants, 6% were Asian less than one-half of 1% were American Indians, Alaska Natives, Hawaiian or Pacific Islanders.

Whites were 78% of all participants.

In the 79 trials that reported ethnicity, Hispanics and Latinos accounted for 12%.

The imbalance was even more striking in phase 3 trials. There, only 7% of the participants were Black or African American.

“Similarly,” the report says, “Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander, American Indian and Alaska Native, and Hispanic or Latino participants were underrepresented in phase 3 trials compared with their representation in the US population.”

“Despite advancements, equity in clinical trial enrollment remains an issue,” the report observes.

representation in vaccine trial chart blog.jpg

The underrepresentation of minorities became an issue during the COVID vaccine trials, as pharmaceutical firms struggled to recruit volunteers. Early into the pandemic, a group of US senators wrote to the pharmaceutical companies involved in the Warp Speed vaccine development program saying trials “must include participants that racially, socioeconomically, and otherwise demographically represent the United States.”

It was that difficulty that prompted the writers of the recent paper to study the demographic make-up of vaccine trials over the last decade. Though the differences between the trial participants and the general population were not great, the disparities are enough to be troubling, the researchers said.

“Small inequities are still important inequities,” Laura Flores, lead author on the study told StatNews. “We’re doing a genuine disservice to these populations by not reaching out and not keeping records or not including them in trials that might benefit them.”

Photo by CDC on Unsplash

Jun 6, 2023

As Pharma Transforms, Drug Stocks Poised for Comeback

Big Pharma is poised for a financial comeback this year, even as both industry leaders and ambitious upstarts will navigate through choppy waters.

J.P. Morgan analyst Chris Schott wrote in mid-December that 2020 will be a recovery year for the stocks of major pharmaceutical companies. After a year in which the S&P 500 was up 25%, the S&P 500 Pharmaceuticals grew not even half that.

Schott basis his forecast on several new drug launches and significant growth for the category of cancer drugs known as PD-1 inhibitors. He also discounts the possibility of drug pricing legislation, suggesting “there appears to be more headline risk than fundamental risk.”

Meanwhile, a CPHi outlook article discusses 10 trends pharma leaders expect the industry to confront during the year. Artificial intelligence and its application in developing, not drugs or clinical outcomes surprisingly, but in predicting timelines and in compliance and regulatory matters.

Cell and gene therapies (CGT) will likely continue to be one of the focus areas in 2020, while the importance of biologicals will continue to grow. Pharma will increasingly turn to CDMOs to take their research from clinical development through regulatory approval.

Peter Bigelow, president of xCel Strategic Consulting, sees more “transformational partnerships between CDMOs and big pharma” in 2020, as the major companies refocus their traditional methods of operation.

“Whereas in the past Big Pharma has been very transactional and has put driving product costs down as a priority, they are instead looking now at partnerships on baskets of products. This means the CDMOs must operate differently, be longer-term in the way they envision these relationships and they must commit to very high degrees of operational and quality improvement.”

Another prediction, this from Jim Miller, founder and former president of Pharmsource, is that CDMOs will continue to be the targets of acquisition. He expects some of the bigger private equity firms to be attracted to the mid-size CDMOs as will larger, public firms.

Morgan analyst Schott agrees. Rather than more mega-mergers, “We see biz dev pivoting towards bolt-on deals in 2020 with focus on building out existing therapeutic verticals and adding potential mid-2020s launch opportunities.”

Jun 6, 2023

Llamas Could Help Prevent COVID Infections

Could a cure for COVID-19 come from llamas?.

Researchers are guarded in their optimism, but in a paper for the journal Cell, they report using a type of antibody called a nanobody produced by llamas to develop a treatment that prevents the virus from invading human cells.

Scientists have long known that llamas and other camelids not only produce antibodies like those made by humans but also create a much smaller, second type, called nanobodies.

Research on these nanobodies began several years ago, when scientists at University of Texas at Austin, the National Institutes of Health and Ghent University in Belgium began studying how they might be used to fight other coronaviruses.

From a llama named Winter, they harvested nanobodies she had produced in response to virus proteins they exposed her to. The results against SARS CoV-1 were effective. Since SARS CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, is so similar, they used copies of those llama nanobodies to engineer an antibody to fight it.

Tested against the virus in laboratory cultures, it proved effective. Now they are testing it on rodents and primates. If it works there, the next step would be human trials.

“This is one of the first antibodies known to neutralize SARS-CoV-2,” said Jason McLellan, associate professor of molecular biosciences at UT Austin and co-senior author.

“Vaccines have to be given a month or two before infection to provide protection,” McLellan said. “With antibody therapies, you’re directly giving somebody the protective antibodies and so, immediately after treatment, they should be protected. The antibodies could also be used to treat somebody who is already sick to lessen the severity of the disease.”

Because nanobodies are so small – about a quarter the size of human antibodies – treatment could be delivered by inhalation.

Observed Daniel Wrapp, a graduate student in McLellan’s lab and a co-author of the paper, “That makes them potentially really interesting as a drug for a respiratory pathogen because you’re delivering it right to the site of infection.”   

Photo by Chris on Unsplash 

[bdp_post_carousel]