04Oct

Knowing what not to say during a salary negotiation is just as important as having the right strategies and being prepared for the discussion. In this article we’ll highlight a few things you should not say when negotiating salary.

“What does this job pay?”

Asking this question at the start of a salary negotiation suggests that you haven’t done your research. This may indicate to your hiring manager that you are disinterested in the role. 

“I’m currently making…”

This is a tricky question as sharing this information can box you in during the salary negotiation process. Disclosing what you currently make and even your desired salary early in the process could undermine your ability to negotiate a fair and competitive offer. Furthermore, what you’re currently making may not accurately reflect your skills, or the current industry trends.

Glassdoor shares some interesting insights on this and many other things you should not say during a salary negotiation.

‘No’ and other negative words

Avoiding negative words is essential as it helps foster a collaborative and constructive atmosphere. Words like ‘no’ can cause tension and potentially damage the relationship with the employer. Instead of ‘no,’ you can opt to say, “I would be more comfortable with…” Ultimately, maintaining a positive attitude contributes to successful negotiation and leaves a favorable impression on the employer.

“Can we try?”

This question may weaken your position and convey uncertainty. It also implies that you may accept less than what you truly desire. Which is why it is important to conduct research, and prepare to assertively state your desired compensation, to convey your value and determination to secure fair compensation.

Jun 6, 2023

Proving the Value of Soft Skills Training

In today’s job market, soft skills have become as important — some say even more important — than possessing all the skills and experience a hiring manager might hope for. Leadership, resilience, good communication and teamwork have become so essential for workers that companies spend millions on programs to cultivate these skills.

” HR executives want to ensure their workers — managers especially — have these vital skills,” notes an article on the website of the Society for Human Resource Management.

Are they getting their money’s worth?

That’s the focus of the article headlined “Measuring the ROI of Soft Skills.” It outlines a five-step process to prove the worth of a program.

Interestingly enough, the process begins with answering the question “Why.”

“When determining the ‘why,’ talent development professionals should keep a hard truth in mind: most soft skills programs do not connect to the business,” write the authors Jack J. Phillips, Patti Phillips and Rebecca Ray. They say research shows company leaders ” want to see the business connection of learning, and sometimes the ROI.”

“Having the skills in place is only behavior,” they say. “Most funders, after all, want more than that. They desire impact and ROI, so plan for it rather than waiting for them to ask.”

The next step in the process is “defining the desired outcomes and business impacts and, when implementing a new solution, developing objectives.” Program designers, the facilitators, participants and their managers should all be involved in designing the training to achieve the goals. “All should be aimed at not only learning, but also using these skills and their subsequent impact.”

The next three steps all involve gathering, analyzing and using the data to both demonstrate the ROI and to improve the program in order to optimize the ROI.

“As it relates to impact, data sources can include key business metrics such as productivity levels, customer satisfaction scores, error rates and the number of workplace accidents,” the authors explain. “As such, a teambuilding program may improve productivity, reduce errors, improve absenteeism rates, reduce employee turnover or raise employee engagement levels.”

For behavior change, the authors recommend gathering data from “observation, focus groups, interviews, performance reviews, customer feedback and surveys of both the individual and stakeholders.”

In analyzing the impact data, cleaning it to isolate the effects of the soft skills program from other influences is essential. Then, the authors say, “the impact data should be converted to money to quantify the program’s monetary benefits.”

The data analysis, they observe, is “is probably the most important step from the perspective of executives.”

Communicating the ROI helps build the business case for continuing to fund soft skills training.

This approach, the article concludes, is valuable at any time, however it is especially relevant now given the “vast fallout from COVID-19.

“Both budgetary challenges and interpersonal work conditions will continue to underscore the importance of soft skills. Now, HR has the tools to make that case with the kind of hard numbers that executives appreciate.”

Photo by jose aljovin on Unsplash

[bdp_post_carousel]

Jun 6, 2023

Bankers Discover They Like Working From Home

Forced to work from home because of the global coronavirus pandemic, banking professionals are warming to the practice and discovering they can be even more productive at home than in the office.

That’s a dramatic reversal from what they were thinking shortly after they first began working remotely.

In April, when Deutsche Bank first surveyed financial professionals, 47% said once the pandemic subsided they would work from home only when they had to. In the latest survey, conducted two weeks ago, only 31% expressed that attitude. Now, 63% said they plan on working from home at least one or two days a week.

In the April survey, 36% said they intend to work from home once or twice a week. Another 11% said they intended to work remotely three or more days a week.

What’s behind the change in attitude? The Deutsche Bank survey reported by eFinancialCareers, apparently didn’t probe that deeply. However, a question about productivity suggests at least part of the reason is that almost 4-in-10 respondents are getting more work done at home than they did in the office.

In April, as workers were still settling in to the new routine, 29% said they were more productive. In the May survey, 37% claimed greater productivity. Counting those who now say there’s no change in their productivity, then 69% of finance professionals say they are as productive or more so working from home.

Interestingly, the more senior the professional, the more likely they are to claim an increase in productivity. A chart in the eFinancialCareers report shows finance professionals over 45 reporting they are more productive by 10 percentage points or more compared to their younger colleagues.

Hinting that working remotely may become more the rule than the exception for Deutsche Bank employees, CEO Christian Sewing told shareholders during the firm’s annual meeting that it is a way to save money.

“If 60% of employees worldwide can work away from their offices and still deliver excellent service to our clients, then of course we have to ask ourselves: can we give our staff additional flexibility to work from home if they want to?” Sewing said in his speech to shareholders. “And if that’s the case, do we need quite so many offices in expensive urban centers?”

Photo by Yasmina H on Unsplash

[bdp_post_carousel]